If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead. — S. Luke, 16:31.
It is related of Charles Kingsley, that, as he lay dying,
when one who stood by bent over the bed and asked what feeling he experienced,
he replied, almost with his last breath, ' ' I feel — the most intense
curiosity ! ' ' No stranger death-bed words, perhaps, were ever spoken. The man
lay at the point of death, but no fear of death possessed him, nor terror of
judgment, nor anxiety concerning the state of his soul. He was consumed with an
intense curiosity, as he neared the dark valley, to see what lay on the other
side ; to be transferred, with the wrench of dissolution, from the region of
faith to the realm of sight ; to be at one moment gasping for breath upon a
sick-bed, with the muffled sounds of earthly life beating upon his
consciousness — the ticking of a clock, the cry of grief, the voice of
commendatory prayer with its insistence upon the Christian faith of ages — and
suddenly, in a flash, to float away into a new consciousness, really to see how
near to truth are the dreams of men, and their visions of angels and
archangels, Christ, God, eternity! The incident symbolizes a great human
yearning, a desire for exact knowledge touching the unseen. Gazing out over the
sands of Egypt
for thousands of years the Sphinx symbolizes the same. It is the desire of all
ages. Every one of you, at one time or an other, has felt this intense
curiosity.
Many an earnest man has wished that he might receive from the
unseen world beyond the grave some definite message from a relative, from a
friend, who has passed on there, dwells there. We wonder sometimes if they do
not desire to send back to us such messages. Are they so oblivious, in their
new state of existence, that they would not, if they could, send us a word to
console us, to warn us, to correct our misapprehensions of the world beyond!
There are those who claim to have received such messages. But, for the most
part, these messages are not sufficiently illuminating or uplifting to warrant
the belief that they come from a state of existence superior to our own.
It is not strange that the Parable of Dives and Lazarus, with
its reference to conditions of a future life, should have been made the basis
of definite beliefs concerning what has not been otherwise revealed. For surely
there are no words to which Christians should pay greater heed than those of
our Lord and Master. But before we venture to build beliefs upon isolated parts
of this parable, we must ascertain, if we can, what is the drift of its
teaching as a whole. And when we have done so, is it not true that so far from
being intended to give definite information concerning a future state, the very
climax of the parable signifies that such information is not really desirable,
and would fail to effect the object for which it is so earnestly sought!
For Dives has found his place in the un seen world. It is a
world, by the way, quite Jewish in its setting, as though our Lord had employed
the prevailing Jewish conception to point His moral. And Dives finds him self
grievously disappointed. He is altogether surprised at what he finds when he
awakes in the place of departed spirits. He begs permission to send back to the
living a message of warning from the dead. But his request is refused. Not that
such communication is impossible. Not that such a message would lack an eager welcome,
or profound attention. But it would not finally accomplish any moral result. It
might satisfy curiosity, but it would not convert; it would not change moral
purpose in the land of the living. "If they hear not Moses and the
prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead."
The man's amazement at the contrast between life, as he
measured it, and life, as God measures it, brings to a climax a series of contrasts
in which the parable abounds. The story begins by creating a contrast which
throws into bold relief the two extremest types of life in this world. There is
one man who embodies the worldly idea of success.
Inexhaustible wealth, a luxurious home, perfect health, and a
coterie of boon companions. He seems to have no care in the world; he wears the
purple of kings; every day he pre sides at a sumptuous banquet. The world knowss
not whether the heart that beats beneath the purple is the noblest, or the meanest
; or whether the hand that lifts the goblet is the cleanest, or the most
contaminated. The world sees only the purple and the banquet. The eyes glitter
and the mouths water at the thought of these things, and thousands of men bend
closer at thousands of tasks all the way down the line which presses toward the
golden goal.
Then there is the other man who embodies the world's idea of
failure. Ordinarily he would be hidden from sight in a dingy garret in some far
off part of town. But, by way of contrast, he is flung all in a heap at the
very gateway of the house of the many banquets. He is penniless, homeless, sick
and friendless. The street dogs are the friends who gather about him and nurse
the wounds of his half- naked body. The crumbs that fall from the banquet table
are his daily bread. The world knows not whether the heart that throbs beneath
the poor man's rags is true or false; or whether the hand that reaches for the
crumbs is weak because of dissipation, or because it would never touch
dishonor. The world sees only the rags and the starvation. The eyes grow cold
at the sight, and the lines about the mouth harden at the thought of these
things, and men shudder as they bend close at their thousand tasks, saying,
"Heaven save us from that!"
But the day arrives when Lazarus comes no more to beg for
crumbs at the gate of the great house. The dogs miss their old companion.
Lazarus is dead. The banqueters miss the presence at the gate of the odd,
familiar character. They do not see the angels who have carried him to Paradise, with tender care. And in the course of time the
prince of good fellows lies dead in his banquet hall. The lights are
extinguished. His banquet is over forever. They march from the great house to
the last resting place, in magnificent array, with pompous dirges.
Here is the last chapter of all ordinary stories of life. But
of this story it is only the first. The next begins with the great awakening in
the world of departed spirits. The Ever Successful One lifts up his eyes to
take in his new surroundings in the world be yond. Not one of the things is
there upon which he has learned to depend as essential to success and
happiness. What is an eternal oratorio to one who has no ear for music! Others
might delight in it, but for him it is torment. And there is Lazarus,
transported with ecstasy, resting in the very bosom of the Father of the
Faithful!
It seems an abominable
injustice that one man should be cap able of such utter misery, while an old
neighbor should be so blissfully happy, and in the same world! But Abraham
says, "Son, remember how it was in the other world, that thou in thy
lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things : but now
he is comforted, and thou art tormented." Then Dives remembered the daily
banquets at which he had presided. How thoughtless and careless he had been of
eternal consequences! But then, how could he have known ? He had not been
sufficiently warned. If God had really desired his salvation why had He made it
possible for him to doubt? Why had the Almighty not faced him with some
absolute, compelling conviction of the existence of a future life and eternal
judgment? There are those five brothers of his, still living on in the same
ignorance and carelessness, measuring out to themselves the same miserable
destiny. The lights are by this time flaming again in the banquet hall.
The boon companions are there. The empty seat has been
filled, and the old revel is going on. But he will warn them if God will not.
"I pray thee, Father Abraham," he cries," send
Lazarus to my father's house; for I have five brethren; that he may testify
unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. Let him suddenly
appear as a terrible specter at their feast, a messenger from the dead, clothed
in the rags which he wore when he lay starving at the gate; let him freeze them
with terror; let him describe to them the misery of my fate ! ' ' But Abraham
says unto him, "If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they
be persuaded though one rose from the dead."
The vast human ignorance of the life be yond does not deny us
the ground for right belief and right living here. Nay, if the un seen were all
revealed, if we were enabled now actually to see that toward which we grope
with such intense curiosity, it would not effect a genuine moral reformation,
or make better lives, where our present knowledge has failed.
There is a striking historic instance of the kind of morality
produced by a certainty concerning what God has left unrevealed. At the close
of the Tenth century there swept over Europe a
strange conviction that with the year 1000 A. D. the world would come to an
end. The belief seems to have been based upon a literal interpretation of a
passage in the Book of Revelation. Many Christians of that time believed that
for every man life would come to an end upon a definitely known date. It might
have seemed that such knowledge was desirable, and would bring to pass a great
moral reform. But it proved to be undesirable, and it did not bring about any
genuine improvement.
While the prediction was false, so many believed it to be
true, so many acted upon it, that it enables us to measure by its results the
practical value of this kind of knowledge, supposing it could be obtained. In
the Tenth century it produced an entirely artificial morality. Useful pur suits
of life were abandoned. Commerce was neglected. People gave all their wealth to
the Church by way of driving a bargain with God. They fought for places to
sleep on the porches of churches that they might be saved by being near the
bones of saints, and spared by clinging to other people's virtues. The more
reckless of them determined that life should be as gay as it was short. All
government and restraint had been abandoned.
Those who chose went about fighting, roistering, burning and
pillaging. The logical result of the belief, apparently, was to reduce human
society to a mob, some sniveling, others cursing, a spectacle dishonor able
both to God and men.
In our own day, a somewhat similar phase of religion appears.
Not, in our case, that religion has exchanged an uncertainty for definite and
reliable information, as the Tenth century believed. The Twentieth century
views the whole situation from a different angle. The modern plea is to abandon
mystery altogether, and to reduce the dogmas of religion to the least common
denominator of what can be intellectually ascertained, and proved, and
demonstrated. While nothing could be more reactionary from the religion of the
Tenth Century, the underlying thought is the same. It is regarded as desirable
that the truths of religion should be removed from the realm of faith, and
brought within the reach of mathematical certainty.
There are many advocates of this program who do not realize
all that such an intellectual position involves. One man objects to the dogma of
the Virgin Birth as being incapable of logical proof, but says he believes in
the Incarnation.
Another cannot intellectually accept the Incarnation, but believes
the doctrine of personal immortality. Another rejects everything usually
bearing the name of dogma, but believes in the Love and Fatherhood of God. In
these arbitrary choices of belief it is not generally perceived that the same
intellectual grounds for rejection of the dogma disliked would argue with equal
force against the dogma accepted and preferred. If the Incarnation be a dogma,
so is the Brotherhood of Man ; if immortality be a dogma, so is the Love of
God. And when you come to measure any or all of these dogmas by a standard of
intellectual, logical demonstration, not one of them can be so established
beyond a doubt. While many converging lines of evidence appear that convince
the Christian believer of the logic of Christian dogmas, not one of these
doctrines is capable of the kind of proof that amounts to scientific certainty.
You cannot scientifically prove the Divinity of Christ, or the immortality of
the soul, not even the existence of a personal God.
The reason that the very skeptics who reject one doctrine
upon intellectual grounds, yet cling firmly to some other doctrine, is that
there is a human hunger for belief in truths that are quite beyond the range of
logical demonstration, and are established upon other and higher ground than
mathematical.
A living, human soul is never quite able to make of himself
such a logic-machine that he does not, in things that concern him most deeply,
believe where he cannot prove, and where the ultimate truths are incapable of
demonstration. In mathematical problems perfect proof is always possible,
because man himself has formulated the rules, and created the symbols and
defined the conditions with which he works.1 But there are deeper truths that
lie beyond the range of demonstration. And wonderful as the logical faculty is,
it is not the highest and supremest intellectual quality. The human mind
possesses a quality of intuition and insight and vision that leaps beyond the
range of scientific demonstration to grasp the deepest and most vital truths
concerning the soul and God. This is the quality of faith. It would be sad
indeed for the world if religion were based alone upon logical demonstration,
and if its vital truths could be grasped only by a mental aristocracy.
Then would there be religion for the polished gentleman in
his well-furnished library, but none for the ignorant old woman dying in her
gar ret. There would be religion for Dives, but none for Lazarus. Boston, and not Jerusalem,
would be the Holy
City. And the apostles of
religion would not be Galilean peasants, but the prize scholars of modern
universities. If you go to the type of man who represents, in intellectual
capacity, the low average of the great majority, and present to him a religion
of cosmic forces and ethical culture, what will he make of it? But go to him
with the gospel of Jesus Christ the God-Man, dying for him upon the Cross, and
you have the basis of a genuine appeal that may reach the simplest
intelligence, and yet a doctrine that intellectual genius finds unfathomable.
It is this quality of the Christian religion over which the Founder rejoiced.
"I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hid
these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto
babes." The power of the Christian faith lies in its profound simplicity.
It is universal because it is human. It reaches the mighty because it touches
the lowly.
A conception of religion that reaches no higher than logical
demonstration will carry is weakest in its moral distinctions between right and
wrong. From the purely scientific plane, actions that we call right and deeds
that we call wrong are so considered by reason of the evolution of inherited
prejudices, and many moral values are more or less arbitrary and fictitious.
From the scientific plane, they have no ultimate imperative sanction behind
them. When desire and present advantage are on the side of wrong, and when
right is supported by nothing more than an inherited prejudice, how easily
shall the necessary wrong become the possible right! The whole moral system of
civilization would be shaken to its foundations. The power that saves is that
men's Christian instincts are stronger than their arguments. Their morality is
Christian. The atmosphere in which they fly their newly invented theological
aeroplanes is Christian. There is no place to show how powerless are their
religious inventions to stand alone.
But the religious answer to the question why the future must
be shrouded in uncertainty is this: the Faith which guides a man's life in his
journey toward the unseen is not merely intellectual, it is moral. That a
straight line is the shortest distance between two points is a purely
intellectual proposition. You can see that it must be true. The evidence for it
is absolutely compulsory, either for the most exalted saint or the most
hardened sinner. Morals do not enter into the question. But that the way of the
Cross is the certain road to eternal life, that is a moral proposition. The
evidence for that proposition cannot be intellectually compulsory.
The man who insists that he be intellectually compelled to
have faith in Jesus Christ would as reasonably insist that he be physically
compelled by a force of police to live the life of Christ. You believe in a
good man by virtue of the goodness in you which corresponds to the goodness in
him. You believe in a good cause by reason of the qualities in yourself which
find expression in the righteousness of the cause. And to follow the impulse of
this highest goodness in us to believe, even where we cannot see the end of the
way to which it leads, is just as much a part of the moral test of character,
as the choice between deeds and actions good and bad. Lazarus coming back from
the dead to compel the trembling belief of the five banqueters is just as
futile, from the moral point of view, as a police raid which should confiscate
the purple and fine linen, and compel the diners to close the banquet hall.
"If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded
though one rose from the dead."
For a life which neglects the opportunity that lies day by
day at the very door, there can never be the excuse that you had not sufficient
warning, or divine assurance of the out come. You have more than Moses and the
prophets : you have the life and example and power of Jesus Christ, and the
means of grace which He ordained ; you have the daily testimony of conscience
illuminated by the gift of the Holy Ghost. You have the same spiritual
opportunities which have enabled men for nineteen centuries to testify by their
lives to the supreme power of Jesus Christ, the same opportunities to which the
best men you know today, if you could learn their story, owe whatever power
they have to resist the temptations that beset them, and to live in some degree
as God meant them to live.
The things that we are sure of are sufficient to live by,
even if they seem to lead us out into the dark. Dwell not so much on the things
that you doubt. Be not faint hearted because the things which revelation has
not revealed baffle all speculation. Begin with what you do believe, and make
that count. Live up to that light. Faith, like a grain of mustard seed, may be
small in the beginning. But it grows, if you are faithful to that little. It
thrusts its roots deep into the earth, and lifts its branches higher and higher
toward heaven, until it becomes the mightiest of all living, growing things.
No comments:
Post a Comment